ArtMetalsocial networking for the metal arts |
|
Photographing Work?
paisleymermaid -
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 12:30pm
Jewelry | Whitesmithing | Artist Inspiration | Money Makers | ArtMetal NextGen images | photography | photos Hi All, One of my biggest frustrations is trying to get good images of my work. I'm great at photographing nature. But taking pics of my jewelry is something I really loathe. I have bought an inexpensive lightbox with an open front, but still my pieces just don't look so good on dig. Some of you have pics that are clear and up close and the colors look right. For silver, what background color do you use? For copper? What watt lighting do you use? My 2 lamps are 20 W each and I'm thinking they aren't strong enough. The camera I use couldn't be better, so it isn't that. ![]() Yellow
Frank Castiglione -
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 2:46pm
Hi Paisleymermaid, ![]() Cloud Dome
raferguson -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 8:22pm
The last time I went to a jeweler's conference several people were high on something called a cloud dome, which effectively diffuses the light. http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art30856.asp However, that does not explain why the colors came out so far off. It may be that your digital camera is confused by the limited colors in the photo, read the manual for possible help. As someone else said, learn Photoshop Richard http://www.fergusonsculpture.com ![]() If you look at the
marilyn -
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 2:33pm
If you look at the whitesmithing section, I have a Penannular Broach posted and it is silver. I'm not a fancy photogrpher. I took it with a digital camera under flouresent light on a white peice of computer paper. I do occasionly get pictures with that yellow look and I'm not sure why. marilyn ![]() Laura, Get yourself some
Rich Waugh -
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 7:29pm
Laura, Get yourself some fairly powerful, daylight spectrum halogen bulbs, something on the order of 50 watts or greater. I would go for 200 watts if possible. You simply cannot have too much light. Next, get yourself some 90% white reflection card stock from the photo supply, a couple of 22"x28" sheets. These will reflect fill light from the sides and/or back to remove harsh shadows. Usea reasonably neutral background like medium gray, blue or maroon, and avoid black or white as backgrounds. Too much contrast ruins the midtones and makes the image look too harsh. Expewrimetn with placement of lights, trying from every angle until you see what you like - don't forget the reflection cards to soften shadows. I recommend getting and learning to use Adobe Photoshop. Yes, it has a steep learning curve, but it is the best there is and you can work absolute wonders with it once you learn just a bit of it. Those who are truly proficient with Photoshop can do anything. Lastly, for highly reflective work such as polished silver or gold, it is sometimes necessary to polarize your floodlights and use a polarizing filter on the camera lens to reduce glare and reflections. For ordinary materials, many industrial photographers use a matte spray to kill reflections, but on polished metal nothing works like a polarizer. With it, you can reduce the reflectins by any amount you want, achieving just the look you desire. ![]() Thanks to everyone for your
paisleymermaid -
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 11:59pm
Thanks to everyone for your suggestions. I will try them all. I actually do know how to use photoshop. My hope will be not having to edit and to get these pics looking good on shoot. But that is definitely a good solution for some issues. ![]() keep it real
xart212 -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 4:07pm
hi, given all the light options i like real light best, ala the sun. try it outdoors on the ground or even on your window sill. remember with digi you don't need to get close close to the object when you can crop the piture. try the telephoto lens setting, 5ft away, with a tripod, and no flash. this will give you the most realistic (not off color) look. I would also try to get a soft grey (or gray) construction paper, towel or matt-board for a background. david ![]() Here's a couple of comments
webminster -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 4:19pm
Here's a couple of comments on the picture you are referencing:
I use to be a professional photographer before I got into metalworking. What I have learned is to "keep it simple" works best if you do not have all the pro equipment. This is why I use northern light exposures as I've indicated above. Hope this helps you with your photography. ![]() I shoot my own jewelry.
Dick C -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 8:58pm
I shoot my own jewelry. Only do it occasionally though, so lessons learned often don't sink in very well. As has been mentioned, shooting outdoors with diffuse light is a about the easiest way to get a well lit piece, but here in Michigan, going outside to shoot a piece in freezing weather isn't going to happen. When I started with a film camera I would use two or three 250w tungsten daylight bulbs. The light was good, but they were hot as hell. I'd often scorch whatever I was using to diffuse them with. They were too hot to leave on while repositioning pieces. Then, when digital came around I bought a few strobes. They worked OK, but since they were small, without modeling lights, you had to set up, take a shot, adjust, take another, adjust... etc.--zeroing in on a good setup. That was also a pain. Recently I picked up a couple 5000k compact fluorescents. One is 55w and the other is 105w. The light is fairly white, but doesn't seem quite as nice as the tungsten (although I was using film then and I do recall a lot of processing came back weirdly colored) or the strobes, but they are cool and the bulbs can be left on for extended periods. The light is softer, but you'd still want to diffuse it. Something to keep in mind is the distance of your lights to the object. If you move your lights in half the distance, you increase the light on the object 4 times. If you're shooting very small objects, and your bulbs aren't too hot, you can try moving them in very close to your work. As far as backgrounds go--I like white, but I've been thinking about getting a graduated one. I've also seen shots on semi-reflective acrylic that look very nice. ![]() One thing I neglected to
Rich Waugh -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 9:02pm
One thing I neglected to mention in my earlier response, and which is important, is that of diffuse lighting. When I was doing protfolio shots of my jewelry years ago, I found a nifty little nylon camping tent of the "dome" style made from white ripstop nylon. It made the perfect photo enclosure for anything that would fit inside it comfortably. The lights were placed outside it, of course, and yielded a beautiful, diffuse white light that was very controllable. Sadly, I no longer have that little tent and no one seems to make them in white anymore - except, naturally, for photography purposes and then they're pretty darn expensive. I will agree with Enrique that outdoor indirect lighting is provably the best way to go for simplicity, though for reflective pieces I still prefer contolled, polarized lighting. That is an expensive way to go, however, so take enrique's suggestions and work with them to get proficient at it. The greatest thing about digital photography is that you can practice endlessly for free. ![]() Rich, What you are
paisleymermaid -
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 9:45pm
Rich, What you are describing that you used to take your pics sounds like the lightbox "Portable Lighting Studio" I bought at Walmart for $49.00. It has 3 parachute like white fabric sides, different colored backgrounds and 2 lights that sit outside of it. The lights also have diffusers. The dinky tripod that came with it...well...for lack of a better word...Sucks. It's legs slowly slide back in while trying to shoot...lol. I came home after I bought it so excited and turned out to be sorely disappointed. From what everyone is saying, firstly I'm figuring my light is indeed to way to dim. So, I don't recommend buying this kit from Walmart. They do have nicer ones on Ebay, but for more money. I was in a hurry and tired of spending so much time trying to take pics. I want to make stuff, not sit there taking pictures of it over and over and over growling and cursing all the while. I do have a new found respect for professional photographers!!! My patience level is severely limited for this. I really appreciate all your input everyone. I am going to use all of your suggestions. Hopefully I'll have time this weekend to try again. If you start seeing images posted by me you'll know all is going well! Thanks! ![]() Laura, You're in Baltimore
JaniceF -
Wednesday, March 12, 2008 - 2:41pm
Laura, You're in Baltimore -- I'm in Ellicott City -- if you can't get it straightened out we could get together sometime. My photos aren't great - but they are ok. You can see some of them here: http://doxallodesigns.blogspot.com (here, these - HERE on the grey cloth are taken in a rubbermaid plastic box thats turned on its side....I think they look half way decent...) ~Janice ![]() photography advice
Signature Metalworks -
Thursday, December 18, 2008 - 2:40pm
hello, i'm an photographer at heart - here's a great shot of jewelry by a real photograper - http://www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=718132 the photographer has listed how this was created and what camera & lens, etc. the photo won 3rd place in a jewelry/ad challenge. i don't shoot small art pieces myself. . .but if i did i'd go straight to the best and ask them. . . . hope this helps david "If everyone is thinking alike then somebody isn't thinking." - George S. Patton |
|
Example.....
Example: Spiral Pendant
This piece was photographed on a grey background! and it looks orangey.