ArtMetalsocial networking for the metal arts |
|
ART VS CRAFT
Nic East -
Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 2:36pm
architectural ironwork | Arts and Crafts | creativity | glass | jewelry | novelty | originality | perfection Art is creativity-oriented, while Craft concerns constructing things as a prime objective. Craft is also about marketability of those fabricated artifacts while Art is all about Originality. Performing arts are rarely mistaken for crafts and the written arts are seldom referred to as crafts. A crafter is one who makes artifacts for general consumption without necessary regard for creativity. Art is not about size, technique or intrinsic skill levels. Art is made with reference to stimulating peoples’ emotions and in turn inspiring their craving to create. Art is contemplation crystallized into an artifact or action that should be sensorially stimulating to others. Art is usually done with the idea of uncovering new ground in the aesthetic arena in which the work is being made. Art is always an expression of an individual creator’s conception without necessarily involving a client or customer while Craft is primarily done as a hobby or for perceived economic consideration. As far as motivation is concerned, many say that Art’s reward is in the applause or other kinds of approval. Crafters work at technique of fabrication and are gratified by achieving precision and increased product sales. They are said to be “clever”. They are good “Craftsmen”. While there are probably many other reasons for doing either art or craft, there seems to be a novelty or originality hierarchy emerging with the practice of Art in ascension. Craft is mostly relegated to the simpler or somehow less respectable echelons. Historically, artisans or slaves have produced pottery, fresco and mosaic murals, leather, and metalwork, while Artists have created architecture, painting and sculpture. Archaeological digs have brought many wonderful artifacts to light and some regard these items as Art even though obviously craftsmen and women produced them for “mundane” uses. I think archaeologists have mostly responded to the essentially esoteric or supposed “sophisticated” design of those pieces. There are many crafts today that have been raised to the level of Art by their practitioners. Glass working is a good example. Glassblowers and other flameworkers enjoy respectability as artists even when they are producing craft items because of the essential mystique of their process. Blacksmiths and stone carvers also have profited from this syndrome. Those who make beads have been relegated to the ranks of crafters because of the uses to which their products are put rather than Artistic merit. I suggest that the same aesthetic “yardstick” of creativity, novelty and originality be applied to beadwork so that the public, as art consumers, can accept the more creative work as true Art. Several bead workers have become known as sculptors or artists among their peers, but the art-buying public still views beads as craft items. Very few collectors have given bead workers their due. Perhaps it is time to change their perceptions. Who is the Artist; the craftsman who makes no plans or the architect who designs for the client? I have been both. During my career of well over 35 years of blacksmithing and ornamental ironwork, I saved many architects’ contracts. It seems that many of today's architects can barely design pipe railings and are actually code enforcers rather than creative problem solvers. I can readily understand client disenchantment with some of these architects, but not all by a long shot. All the same, while some architects may be very creative, they are rarely referred to as Artists. There are a few architects living today who are just as creative as Michelangelo Buonarroti or Leonardo Da Vinci. Architectural historians just have not recognized them yet. Creativity has to be recognized by people as well as the creators in order to enter into the public's mind and become part of our culture. Frank Lloyd Wright was one of those highly creative ones who turned the industry upside down. Paolo Soleri is another. There are many more of these polymaths alive today and we must learn to appreciate them. I personally do not live or die by others' approval or dissing. I do like to be admired as much as anyone, but when disapproval comes my way, I simply consider the source and move onward toward my personal frontier and leave them behind. Show and Tell is always a risk-taking proposition for any artist. Rodney Dangerfield spoke for all great craftsmen when he complained, "I can't get no respect". As both an artist and craftsman, I feel this egocentric desire for respect, or at least validation of my best work as keenly as any other person who plies the uncertain waters of this aesthetic ‘scape of artifacts and ideas. I guess it is partly economic and partly driven by peer pressure/acceptance that I try so hard to please with my work. I have, what I have come to term, "Perfection Hunger" and this drives my engine of creativity as much as any search for novelty or intention of originality. Those artists and craftsmen with whom we compare ourselves and look up to are our role models and indeed almost patron saints. Someday, after the temporal smoke clears; perhaps some of our number will also be so regarded. Hopefully, if we persist and outlast our peers, we will live to see that happen to us. ![]() The spectrum of Creativity
Nic East -
Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 7:17pm
Perhaps I should clarify. The classification of Artist vs Craftsman is a matter of goals and attitude as much as quality of technique. Art, to me is a creative, novel, original approach, while craft is somewhat more commercial in intent, yet no less creative. Also, an artist may from time to time work as a craftsman and vice versa. We all change hats and the only reason for those "hats" is to differentiate between intention and not technique or even quality. A great technician may either be a great craftsman or a great artist and sometimes craftsmen raise their content to high art. It is mostly attitude and neither artist nor craftsman has a "higher calling", it is just that we may have a slightly different focus in our approach. Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() Gifts come without a price.
Frank Castiglione -
Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 7:21pm
Gifts come without a price. People leave the womb with artistic talent, craftsmanship is earned.The measure of art as how it moves others has become perverted, ergo abortion bloodied sheets.Artwork that personally moves me looks new every time I experience the same piece. It could be a copy of a copy of a copy, yet fresh. When great art shows no evidence of craftsmanship,it simply hasn't been discovered yet. ![]() Gifts
Nic East -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 6:14pm
Frank: Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() No Price
Frank Castiglione -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 11:58pm
Hi Nic, ![]() Genius, etc
Nic East -
Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 5:36pm
Frank: Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() Stripped Down Racer
Frank Castiglione -
Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 6:25pm
Hi Nic, ![]() "If it's good, it's art, if
matt m myers -
Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 8:01pm
"If it's good, it's art, if it's not, who cares?" Maybe Picasso, maybe not, I'm not sure-m ![]() Good for what?
Nic East -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 5:52pm
Hi Matt: OK, so what should it be? I'll give it a try. When we first see it, does it attract our interest? When we really look at it, does it continue to reveal subtle nuances. Does it "inform us"? Does it keep on surprising our senses? Is it mysterious? When we go away and return does it reveal other secrets? Does it touch us emotionally? Does it engage our intellectual or technical interest? In short, can we be friends with it? If the answer is no, then we pass on to the next piece of Art stuff and give that our attention. Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() Hi Nic, I love this topic.
eligius1427 -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 10:29am
Hi Nic, I love this topic. I have discussed it many times with no answer in site yet learn of a new way to think about art and craft every time. I had posted a thread/question earlier about labels such as sculptor, designer, artist, etc which posed good comments and views. (the thread title was "craft_vs_trade_vs_art_vs_manufacturing" if you want to check it out) In my last conversation about this topic someone posed the view that with art, the artist doesn't know what the end result will look like until they're finished, while with craft there is a plan or end product in mind before starting. I thought it was an interesting view. I personally think the difference between the two is actually just the perception of others to a specific project/task. I've been lucky enough over the past couple of years to have had "trade" projects such as railings and "art" projects like sculptures. What is interesting is that in the same day I can go visit the architect and he'll mention to his coworker what a fine craftsman I am, then immediately go visit the park foundation and they'll say what a talented artist I am. I'm not exactly sure what happened in the truck on the way over to the foundation that turned me into an artist, but it always seems to reverse itself when I go visit the architect (must be some magic street light, i just can't find it :) ). Other than arguments, I've seen no tangible effects between the different labels except in two instances. The art community has at times been very disappointed that craftsman are playing in their backyard and foundation/organizations responsible for picking artists for projects will sometimes lean more towards a "labeled" artist over a craftsman. I heard just last night from a lady involved with an org that often times they send out invites for proposals to specific artists so they don't have to deal with craftsmen and less experienced artists. This certainly doesn't mean that one is better than the other(or even different) but it does offer the "artist" an opportunity the "craftsman" wasn't offered. I want to stress that this does not happen all of the time, but it is one of the few effects of the labels. The second instance is that art seems to be able to command more money for the same amount of material and labor than crafted item. I just bid out a chandelier with a lot of hours in detail work that was deemed extremely over priced, however, a sculpture i just proposed with less hours involved(slightly higher material costs) and 4 times the price of the chandelier was deemed reasonable. If I had presented the chandelier as a sculpture would the price have seemed more adequate? Oftentimes I end up with two of the same questions on this issue. First, who has the magic stick that gets to determine an artist versus craftsman? Art dealers, professors, tradesmen and women, the customer,???? Second, aside from the frustrating discussion every once in a while, does it even matter? Except for maybe the two issues above, which could probably be changed by the craftsman with some marketing, probably not. I end up letting people have their own perception of me and don't get too wrapped up in their opinion. If I had to choose a label for myself it would probably be a very creative craftsman. People can come up to me and say they don't like my design much and i'm usually pretty ok with it. We all have our opinions. However, if someone comes up and says I do shoddy work, well then we might have a scrap. Since I'm more worried about the quality of work over the design I guess that puts me in the craftsman camp. Just where I like it. Jake ![]() Yikes, a clear-headed artist craftsman!
Nic East -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 1:16pm
It is so good to read your thinking, Jake. To me, Art is an adventure while craft is a journey in that, as you say the artist doesn't quite know where he or she is going, but recognises when they arrive. Craftsmen often are a bit more technique-oriented and like to have clear goals. Most of the artist's work is intuitive while the craftsman's is cerebral. Both methods are valid and useful in the marketplace. Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() a few architects who are artists..
man of mettle -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 11:27am
"it seems that many of today's architects can barely design pipe railings and are actually code enforcers rather than creative problem solvers. I can readily understand client disenchantment with some of these architects, but not all by a long shot. All the same, while some architects may be very creative, they are rarely referred to as Artists" i disagree.. here a few architects who are artists... louis kahn, le corbusier, cesar pelli, tadeo ando, zaha hadid, norman foster, jaques herzog, renzo piano, kenzo tange, jean nouvel, jose oubrerie... to name a few.. but i am partial: i am an architecture student getting a masters.. and a craftsman who never blames his tools but rather his lack of creativity and skill. keith ![]() Hi Keith,
eligius1427 -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 1:51pm
Hi Keith, I was an architecture student as well, and although I agree with you that there are some ingenious and talented architects that probably should be considered artists, many archs today fall well short of that status. In my experience, architects and designers have been much more concerned with budget than ingenuity and quality. I always pitch a solid, make it to last 100 yrs design first, and usually have to start sacrificing material, design, labor, because they saw a bathroom faucet that costs $2800. They have usually been much more concerned with the immediate wow effect instead of the wow effect 10 years from now. This is usually achieved by sacrificing quality, a railing or siding that should last 30-100 years, so they can add sparkle and bling, a faucet that will be probably be changed in 5 years whether it needs to or not. That's what separates good designer/artists/architects/etc, they usually achieve a final product that is appreciated for decades. I had the pleasant opportunity to work with a really good architect out of Seattle and WOW, what a difference. He was all about doing things the right way, so the projects looked good and lasted. I was so used to working with budget driven architects that he had to tell me to stop trying to find the most economical way and just find the right way, material, etc. I couldn't just charge or do what i wanted, but he would pay for quality and ingenuity and came to expect it. The client wanted the best, not something that looked like the best. Hopefully you are or will be the kind of architect that will design projects our great grand children will still be able to appreciate and enjoy. Jake ![]() Architects and artists
Nic East -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 1:30pm
There are levels to creativity and while I do not dispute your list and can add an equal amount, still there are a thousant times as many who are hacks. I have known quite a few of those also. They are very popular in the marketplace because the public understands cape cod, log houses and glass boxes, which are all derivitive and have no uniqueness. When I talk of creative artistic architects, I mean those who are constantly reinventing themselves and stylistically metamorphosing so that,while their work is recognizable, it is also quite vital. Frank Geary and Paolo Soleri come to mind. Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() at least one point
man of mettle -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 3:24pm
thanks nic. we can agree on at least one point: "..architecture is indeed the 'Mother of the Arts.' " keith ![]() I usually try and stay out
R L Sidebottom -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 2:08pm
I usually try and stay out of this type of question. I have no desire to offend anyone. I have decided for my own definition, that if it makes me think, feel something or inspires me, it is art. It can be a piece of old machinery with flowing lines or photograph or a piece of steel that has seen the hands of someone with a vision. If I look at something and it makes no impression on me, good or bad, then I really don't consider it art in my opinion. But then again we have to remember that art is in eyes of the beholder and the creator. Rick Sidebottom ![]() Great definition
Nic East -
Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 5:44pm
Hi Rick, thanks for dropping by: Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA ![]() Art is an extra "0" on the
PeterG -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 5:35pm
Art is an extra "0" on the end of the price tag. ![]() Great topic of discussion.
QuiQue -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 9:32pm
Great topic of discussion. One that has been discussed and continues to be discussed due to the wide gamut of definitions which cover "ART." It's the same with the word "LOVE." Too many things fall into the realm of these words. Therefore, it makes it very hard to define. I've included one of the many definitions for art at the bottom of my comment to give you an idea of what we are up against when attempting to define "Art vs Craft." I have struggled for years attempting to define art, craft, and even love. My resolve has been to think of art as not only an object, but also an act of doing. For me, art is accomplished by allowing the Creator to express itself through me. The act of creating a "work of art" is in and of itself, the essence of Art. When I am able to let go of the ego and allow the deeper self to express itself through me, I get blown away by that which I have created. The "I" in this case is the Creator expressing itself through my physical body. I know this may sound strange to some of you. Thing is, we all experience this when we are in the deepest throws of our creations. It doesn't really matter if we are making a tool, railing, or reproduction. There is a place that many of us go into where we loose ourselves (egos). Where time is irrelevant. A place where we become the observer of what our physical self is producing based on the Creators input. I find I go into this "art" space many times throughout the day. It can last a few seconds, or a few minutes. I can't seem to hold onto the moment because my ego gets in the way. It says, "wow, look at what your doing!", and POOF, the moment is lost! So it goes, and I continue to focus and create until the "object of art" is completed. The "act of creation" is Art! Now comes the fun part. If the act of creation is pure enough, it will show itself through the object which has been created. The physical object can be, and usually is, called "a work of art." But there is a third component to defining art objects which adds to the debate of what art is. The third component is the viewer. Each and every one of us has our very own perception of what reality is. Within our perception, we define everything we experience. So it may be that the art which I have created is not seen by anyone else. Does this mean it is not art? No, it simply means that my art creation is not communicating to others. If on the other hand, my art is recognized by many people, and it communicates my intentions, then it is accepted by the majority as "Art." So what about Craft? Well, craft deals with the physical manipulation of materials. It is easier to identify due to standards which have been established by history and knowledgeable people working in the discipline. Can craft be considered art? Absolutely! Remember, it's in the "process of creation" which art is created. The craftsman which is very knowledgeable of his/her craft, demonstrates their knowledge during the creation process. Can a great craftsman create poor art? Sure! I hope that I have brought a small minuscule amount of understanding to what Art is. Heck, mankind has been discussing this topic for thousands of years, so if I haven't made myself clear, then what the heck. The idea is to attempt to communicate and hope I have allowed the Creator a moment to express itself. One of the many definitions from Dictionary.com:
![]() A name
warren -
Friday, May 23, 2008 - 9:56pm
Well there is one thing that I really like about this site.........the name of it ARTMETAL. For years I have tried to fit into the different types of what people call art. Most give you a definition that it needs to be a sculpture to be a piece of art. Well I do not just make sculptures. So when people ask if I am an Sculptor I can say yes. If they ask me if I am a Craftsman, I can say yes. If they ask me if I am a Artist, I can yes, If they ask me if I am a Metal-smith, I can say yes. So I end up being a SCAM. (Just a little joke) See it really does not matter what I make or what I am I just have fun making what I make and try to make money off of what I make. They can call what I make what ever they want and when I die it does not matter what I died as. warren http://www.metalrecipes.com ![]() Art Vrs Craft
Eric Schmidt -
Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 12:04pm
Warren; You forgot one - teacher. Can you work that in there somewhere. Now for the real reason for this post and it is a quibble from QQ's last post. I have to take exception to: #5 A nonscientific branch of learning; one of the liberal arts. I believe this is a misconception and a false and artificial structuring. People see art as the opposite of science and it is not. Good science is good art. It meets all the criteria. You are pushing boundaries. I can give an example. This test was designed to test if the birds can navigate by stars. How to do its was the problem. They were wild birds so you could not let them go and follow hundreds of them around. So they had to be captive, but how could you tell if they would fly around randomly or have a direction to their flight. They have to be captive, have room to fly, be able to see the stars, minimize or eliminate other variables in the experiment, and also have a means of recording the direction they try to fly to. It also has to have the ability to be replicated so others can also conduct the experiment. Someone came up with a simple, elegant, and rather inexpensive experiment to test navigation by stars. They built a flight cage with a steeply sloped floor. The top of the cage was covered with screen to keep the birds contained while letting them see the stars. The sloped part is covered with paper and in the middle of the cage is a flat spot that is an ink pad. The birds are fed well before being placed in this cage for the night. The birds have ink on their feet and when thy fly they will land on the white paper and the ink will leave a record of the direction they flew. It will then be easy to see which way the birds tried to fly all night. If they did not navigate by stars the foot impressions would be equal and random on the paper in the cage. If, on the other hand, they can navigate by the stars, a favored direction should show up from the prints left when they landed. Statistical analysis could be done comparing the data. Almost all the prints were headed toward one direction proving that night flying birds can navigate by the stars among other ways. To me, this elegant in its simplicity experiment was art. The same can be said, I think, about concepts that are new and spring completely from someones mind. String theory, chaos theory, quantum theory all come to mind. They are breaking with traditional modes of thinking and viewing our universe and, although experiments are hard to set-up, the ones that have been done are proving that there is some merit to these alternate (and sometimes bizarre) ways of viewing our universe. It is also an open ended art form in that the art is never complete. Others use it as a basis for their own experiments or thoughts and take it further creating another piece. Thanks. Eric Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine. ![]() WOW! What an answer!
Nic East -
Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 6:30pm
QuiQue: You obviously have thought long and hard about this important subject. I love your definition of creativity as God's Work. If we are indeed little bits of God-stuff co-creating the shared cultural universe, then that certainly is the work of the Creator through us. I also think, by extension, that the energy that drives us to create is very akin to Love. It attracts, energises, satisfies and horrifies like nothing else I can name. The act of being in the Flow of the creative process is one of the highest of highs and far better than booze or drugs. It is better for all concerned, for we artists and craftsmen are the tastemakers and lifestyle designers for all others. I try to do my creative play as a kind of meditation and do not let myself become distracted. Of course the telephone sometimes can stimulate resentment as it breaks my flow of work. Yes, Art can always exist independent of peer approval. Constantin Brancusi worked alone in his studio for 30 years without exhibiting anything. Then BANG, he exploded upon the art scene with a number of "masterpieces". It has often been said that Art is about process rather than outcomes for the artist, but the finished artifact or performance or whatever must stand by itself when it is complete. Let me inject another element into our mix: how does Design fit in? Here, I'll give you a start. Design is a deliberate planning process aimed toward specific or generalized results. Since Art is based upon our imaginative, fantastic or creative drives, it is a discovery process, fraught with adventures for the Artist’s mind. One solves problems with a product in mind, while the other has the encouragement of novelty as its goal. Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA Creativity begins with a novel thought. |
|
Thanks for sharing your
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, Nic. I'm not sure I agree with all of them, but you make some very valid points. Through discourses about these things we can all hone our own thinking and beliefs, I would hope.
It is your thesis of a dichotomy between Art and Craft that I would disagree with, primarily. I don't think that the craftsman is less than the artist, nor do I percieve much of a difference. Both create, both sometimes enjoy profit from their efforts and sometimes don't, but both strive to achieve their goal of completing a piece well. I think the difference is more one of labeling than one of substance.
I have seen many creations of artists that I felt were done in a very un-craftsmanlike fashion, sometimes to the extent that their continued existence was uncertain. At the same time, I have seen craftsmen produce fantastically creative pieces that were clearly done for the love of the work itself, with no thought of profit or other gain beyond the personal satisfaction of having achieved the statement they set out to achieve. I think the line between craft and art is often very,very blurry and indistinct.
As a blacksmith who was originally trained as a silver- and gold- smith, I am moer than content to be called a craftsman. In fact, I am proud to be known as one who does a craftsmanlike job of what he creates. I also strive to extend my boundaries and create things that communicate beyond themselves. Is that the sole province of the artist, or is that another aspect of craftsmanship? I don't have an answer for that. The lines are as blurry form within as from without.
Thanks for opening this topic!
Rich