ART VS CRAFT

| | | | | | |

Art is creativity-oriented, while Craft concerns constructing things as a prime objective. Craft is also about marketability of those fabricated artifacts while Art is all about Originality. Performing arts are rarely mistaken for crafts and the written arts are seldom referred to as crafts. A crafter is one who makes artifacts for general consumption without necessary regard for creativity.

Art is not about size, technique or intrinsic skill levels. Art is made with reference to stimulating peoples’ emotions and in turn inspiring their craving to create. Art is contemplation crystallized into an artifact or action that should be sensorially stimulating to others. Art is usually done with the idea of uncovering new ground in the aesthetic arena in which the work is being made.

Art is always an expression of an individual creator’s conception without necessarily involving a client or customer while Craft is primarily done as a hobby or for perceived economic consideration.

As far as motivation is concerned, many say that Art’s reward is in the applause or other kinds of approval. Crafters work at technique of fabrication and are gratified by achieving precision and increased product sales. They are said to be “clever”. They are good “Craftsmen”.

While there are probably many other reasons for doing either art or craft, there seems to be a novelty or originality hierarchy emerging with the practice of Art in ascension. Craft is mostly relegated to the simpler or somehow less respectable echelons. Historically, artisans or slaves have produced pottery, fresco and mosaic murals, leather, and metalwork, while Artists have created architecture, painting and sculpture. Archaeological digs have brought many wonderful artifacts to light and some regard these items as Art even though obviously craftsmen and women produced them for “mundane” uses. I think archaeologists have mostly responded to the essentially esoteric or supposed “sophisticated” design of those pieces.

There are many crafts today that have been raised to the level of Art by their practitioners. Glass working is a good example. Glassblowers and other flameworkers enjoy respectability as artists even when they are producing craft items because of the essential mystique of their process. Blacksmiths and stone carvers also have profited from this syndrome. Those who make beads have been relegated to the ranks of crafters because of the uses to which their products are put rather than Artistic merit. I suggest that the same aesthetic “yardstick” of creativity, novelty and originality be applied to beadwork so that the public, as art consumers, can accept the more creative work as true Art. Several bead workers have become known as sculptors or artists among their peers, but the art-buying public still views beads as craft items. Very few collectors have given bead workers their due. Perhaps it is time to change their perceptions.

Who is the Artist; the craftsman who makes no plans or the architect who designs for the client? I have been both. During my career of well over 35 years of blacksmithing and ornamental ironwork, I saved many architects’ contracts. It seems that many of today's architects can barely design pipe railings and are actually code enforcers rather than creative problem solvers. I can readily understand client disenchantment with some of these architects, but not all by a long shot. All the same, while some architects may be very creative, they are rarely referred to as Artists.

There are a few architects living today who are just as creative as Michelangelo Buonarroti or Leonardo Da Vinci. Architectural historians just have not recognized them yet. Creativity has to be recognized by people as well as the creators in order to enter into the public's mind and become part of our culture. Frank Lloyd Wright was one of those highly creative ones who turned the industry upside down. Paolo Soleri is another. There are many more of these polymaths alive today and we must learn to appreciate them.

I personally do not live or die by others' approval or dissing. I do like to be admired as much as anyone, but when disapproval comes my way, I simply consider the source and move onward toward my personal frontier and leave them behind. Show and Tell is always a risk-taking proposition for any artist.

Rodney Dangerfield spoke for all great craftsmen when he complained, "I can't get no respect". As both an artist and craftsman, I feel this egocentric desire for respect, or at least validation of my best work as keenly as any other person who plies the uncertain waters of this aesthetic ‘scape of artifacts and ideas.

I guess it is partly economic and partly driven by peer pressure/acceptance that I try so hard to please with my work. I have, what I have come to term, "Perfection Hunger" and this drives my engine of creativity as much as any search for novelty or intention of originality.

Those artists and craftsmen with whom we compare ourselves and look up to are our role models and indeed almost patron saints. Someday, after the temporal smoke clears; perhaps some of our number will also be so regarded. Hopefully, if we persist and outlast our peers, we will live to see that happen to us.


Rich Waugh's picture

Thanks for sharing your

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, Nic. I'm not sure I agree with all of them, but you make some very valid points. Through discourses about these things we can all hone our own thinking and beliefs, I would hope.

It is your thesis of a dichotomy between Art and Craft that I would disagree with, primarily. I don't think that the craftsman is less than the artist, nor do I percieve much of a difference. Both create, both sometimes enjoy profit from their efforts and sometimes don't, but both strive to achieve their goal of completing a piece well. I think the difference is more one of labeling than one of substance.

I have seen many creations of artists that I felt were done in a very un-craftsmanlike fashion, sometimes to the extent that their continued existence was uncertain. At the same time, I have seen craftsmen produce fantastically creative pieces that were clearly done for the love of the work itself, with no thought of profit or other gain beyond the personal satisfaction of having achieved the statement they set out to achieve. I think the line between craft and art is often very,very blurry and indistinct.

As a blacksmith who was originally trained as a silver- and gold- smith, I am moer than content to be called a craftsman. In fact, I am proud to be known as one who does a craftsmanlike job of what he creates. I also strive to extend my boundaries and create things that communicate beyond themselves. Is that the sole province of the artist, or is that another aspect of craftsmanship? I don't have an answer for that. The lines are as blurry form within as from without.

Thanks for opening this topic!

Rich


Nic East's picture

The spectrum of Creativity

Perhaps I should clarify. The classification of Artist vs Craftsman is a matter of goals and attitude as much as quality of technique. Art, to me is a creative, novel, original approach, while craft is somewhat more commercial in intent, yet no less creative. Also, an artist may from time to time work as a craftsman and vice versa. We all change hats and the only reason for those "hats" is to differentiate between intention and not technique or even quality. A great technician may either be a great craftsman or a great artist and sometimes craftsmen raise their content to high art. It is mostly attitude and neither artist nor craftsman has a "higher calling", it is just that we may have a slightly different focus in our approach.

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


Frank Castiglione's picture

Gifts come without a price.

Gifts come without a price. People leave the womb with artistic talent, craftsmanship is earned.The measure of art as how it moves others has become perverted, ergo abortion bloodied sheets.Artwork that personally moves me looks new every time I experience the same piece. It could be a copy of a copy of a copy, yet fresh. When great art shows no evidence of craftsmanship,it simply hasn't been discovered yet.
Peace,eh?
Frank


Nic East's picture

Gifts

Frank:
I live in a place called Jim Thorpe. The reason it is named that is we changed that former town name from Mauch Chunk to J.T. 54 years ago because we were promised a hospital if we did. The promise was made by Grace Thorpe, Jim's daughter. we conducted a nickel-a-week campaign and saved enough to not only change the name, but build a red granite monument to the man who became the Athlete of the 20th Century. Well, we never got the hospital and fifty years later, the tribe even wanted the remains back! That's quintessential Indian Giving!
So, some gifts are not free.
Now, when you talk about Artistic Talent, you seem to be saying that the propensity for creating art is born into us and it is inexerable. Perhaps, but I know that I had to spend thirty years learning Art's value and some of the techniques with which to express it. To me, Art is a developmental process with many attitudes and technical processes that must be learned and honed to that razor-sharpness that bespeaks the true Artist-Craftsman rather than a crude imitation. Of necessity, we must learn to use Art to communicate our value systems, esthetic ideas and cultural schemes in a way that others can understand, be interested in and entertained or otherwise stimulated by. As you say above, Art must move you and be renewing in order for you to value it, otherwise it is so much hokum.
It may be possible to have Art without any technical craftsmanship, but I doubt that it would function as well as a highly crafted artifact, which tells me that Craft is foundational to Art and Art is at the basis of Craft.

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


Frank Castiglione's picture

No Price

Hi Nic,
I still contend that a gift has no price, no strings attached.Sorry about the Jim Thorpe thing, it never was a gift, it sounds more like a bad contract.
I did not say that art was a propensity nor inexerable.What was implied is that artistic talent is a gift, it wasn't bargained for, or distributed in even measure.
The expression of art can improve with effort, but practice doesn't change our gifts.
Genius (an abused term)can supersede all the rules for greatness.Technical prowess sure can make the rest of us look mo betta.
Frank


Nic East's picture

Genius, etc

Frank:
I wonder about artistic talent. I mean how to define it so that it can be used without denigrating the energy that one must put into creating.
I believe genius is at least partly physically manifested by certain differences form the normal human brain. An enlarged Hippocampus or Hypothalamus for starters and The famous savant, Kim Peake has no Corpus Collosum. Are genius and talent related in some way? In what way?

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


Frank Castiglione's picture

Stripped Down Racer

Hi Nic,
We are not created the same.Some one can jump well, someone can hear better etc.Sometimes anomalies occur way below what might be considered the norm; and on the other hand way above.What is measured to decide someone is a genius? IQ perhaps. A battery of tests that measure many facets would be of some advantage. I think that the savant would do well in a narrow portion of the whole spectrum of human abilities.
Do you think that creativity is not an ability? Is it evenly dispensed to each human, or do some people have more or less?
I personally think that it is an ability and that some people not only have more but have WAY more than most. The synergism of all our abilities determines how we interact in the real world.
Frank


matt m myers's picture

"If it's good, it's art, if

"If it's good, it's art, if it's not, who cares?" Maybe Picasso, maybe not, I'm not sure-m


Nic East's picture

Good for what?

Hi Matt:
How do we judge the qualities of Art? How can we agree that it is good or bad or ho-hum? I think we perceive Art through our personal value filters, so what we value most we like most while others may disagree. That's the rub; we need some sort of semi-standard for evaluating Art vs Craft as we encounter it.

OK, so what should it be? I'll give it a try. When we first see it, does it attract our interest? When we really look at it, does it continue to reveal subtle nuances. Does it "inform us"? Does it keep on surprising our senses? Is it mysterious? When we go away and return does it reveal other secrets? Does it touch us emotionally? Does it engage our intellectual or technical interest? In short, can we be friends with it?

If the answer is no, then we pass on to the next piece of Art stuff and give that our attention.

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


eligius1427's picture

Hi Nic, I love this topic.

Hi Nic, I love this topic. I have discussed it many times with no answer in site yet learn of a new way to think about art and craft every time. I had posted a thread/question earlier about labels such as sculptor, designer, artist, etc which posed good comments and views. (the thread title was "craft_vs_trade_vs_art_vs_manufacturing" if you want to check it out)

In my last conversation about this topic someone posed the view that with art, the artist doesn't know what the end result will look like until they're finished, while with craft there is a plan or end product in mind before starting. I thought it was an interesting view. I personally think the difference between the two is actually just the perception of others to a specific project/task. I've been lucky enough over the past couple of years to have had "trade" projects such as railings and "art" projects like sculptures. What is interesting is that in the same day I can go visit the architect and he'll mention to his coworker what a fine craftsman I am, then immediately go visit the park foundation and they'll say what a talented artist I am. I'm not exactly sure what happened in the truck on the way over to the foundation that turned me into an artist, but it always seems to reverse itself when I go visit the architect (must be some magic street light, i just can't find it :) ).

Other than arguments, I've seen no tangible effects between the different labels except in two instances.

The art community has at times been very disappointed that craftsman are playing in their backyard and foundation/organizations responsible for picking artists for projects will sometimes lean more towards a "labeled" artist over a craftsman. I heard just last night from a lady involved with an org that often times they send out invites for proposals to specific artists so they don't have to deal with craftsmen and less experienced artists. This certainly doesn't mean that one is better than the other(or even different) but it does offer the "artist" an opportunity the "craftsman" wasn't offered. I want to stress that this does not happen all of the time, but it is one of the few effects of the labels.

The second instance is that art seems to be able to command more money for the same amount of material and labor than crafted item. I just bid out a chandelier with a lot of hours in detail work that was deemed extremely over priced, however, a sculpture i just proposed with less hours involved(slightly higher material costs) and 4 times the price of the chandelier was deemed reasonable. If I had presented the chandelier as a sculpture would the price have seemed more adequate?

Oftentimes I end up with two of the same questions on this issue.

First, who has the magic stick that gets to determine an artist versus craftsman? Art dealers, professors, tradesmen and women, the customer,????

Second, aside from the frustrating discussion every once in a while, does it even matter? Except for maybe the two issues above, which could probably be changed by the craftsman with some marketing, probably not. I end up letting people have their own perception of me and don't get too wrapped up in their opinion. If I had to choose a label for myself it would probably be a very creative craftsman. People can come up to me and say they don't like my design much and i'm usually pretty ok with it. We all have our opinions. However, if someone comes up and says I do shoddy work, well then we might have a scrap. Since I'm more worried about the quality of work over the design I guess that puts me in the craftsman camp. Just where I like it.

Jake


Nic East's picture

Yikes, a clear-headed artist craftsman!

It is so good to read your thinking, Jake. To me, Art is an adventure while craft is a journey in that, as you say the artist doesn't quite know where he or she is going, but recognises when they arrive. Craftsmen often are a bit more technique-oriented and like to have clear goals. Most of the artist's work is intuitive while the craftsman's is cerebral. Both methods are valid and useful in the marketplace.
I, too have noticed the public's snobbishness concerning art and condesention toward craftsmen. I wear both hats as you seem to and each is a kind of protective coloration that allows us to be recognised, respected and get our price. Personal self respect and integrity are the prime movers in creative politics. We need validation and acknowledgement for that is similar to applause in the performing arts.
I agree that an unenlightened negative critique of my work will rile me in the direction of combat. Call my work anything but shoddy!
Thanks for your thoughtful comments,

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


man of mettle's picture

a few architects who are artists..

"it seems that many of today's architects can barely design pipe railings and are actually code enforcers rather than creative problem solvers. I can readily understand client disenchantment with some of these architects, but not all by a long shot. All the same, while some architects may be very creative, they are rarely referred to as Artists"

i disagree.. here a few architects who are artists...

louis kahn, le corbusier, cesar pelli, tadeo ando, zaha hadid, norman foster, jaques herzog, renzo piano, kenzo tange, jean nouvel, jose oubrerie...

to name a few..

but i am partial: i am an architecture student getting a masters..

and a craftsman who never blames his tools but rather his lack of creativity and skill.

keith


eligius1427's picture

Hi Keith,

Hi Keith,

I was an architecture student as well, and although I agree with you that there are some ingenious and talented architects that probably should be considered artists, many archs today fall well short of that status. In my experience, architects and designers have been much more concerned with budget than ingenuity and quality. I always pitch a solid, make it to last 100 yrs design first, and usually have to start sacrificing material, design, labor, because they saw a bathroom faucet that costs $2800. They have usually been much more concerned with the immediate wow effect instead of the wow effect 10 years from now. This is usually achieved by sacrificing quality, a railing or siding that should last 30-100 years, so they can add sparkle and bling, a faucet that will be probably be changed in 5 years whether it needs to or not. That's what separates good designer/artists/architects/etc, they usually achieve a final product that is appreciated for decades. I had the pleasant opportunity to work with a really good architect out of Seattle and WOW, what a difference. He was all about doing things the right way, so the projects looked good and lasted. I was so used to working with budget driven architects that he had to tell me to stop trying to find the most economical way and just find the right way, material, etc. I couldn't just charge or do what i wanted, but he would pay for quality and ingenuity and came to expect it. The client wanted the best, not something that looked like the best.

Hopefully you are or will be the kind of architect that will design projects our great grand children will still be able to appreciate and enjoy.

Jake


Nic East's picture

Architects and artists

There are levels to creativity and while I do not dispute your list and can add an equal amount, still there are a thousant times as many who are hacks. I have known quite a few of those also. They are very popular in the marketplace because the public understands cape cod, log houses and glass boxes, which are all derivitive and have no uniqueness. When I talk of creative artistic architects, I mean those who are constantly reinventing themselves and stylistically metamorphosing so that,while their work is recognizable, it is also quite vital. Frank Geary and Paolo Soleri come to mind.
When you are constantly renewing and experimenting, designing as you ride your creative shockwave, you will have reached the level of Art with your architecture. Until then, most of what you will be required to do is repetitive and conforming. I wish you well with your selected career and hope that you do become one of that very rare breed, for architecture is indeed the "Mother of the Arts".

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


man of mettle's picture

at least one point

thanks nic.

we can agree on at least one point: "..architecture is indeed the 'Mother of the Arts.' "

keith


R L Sidebottom's picture

I usually try and stay out

I usually try and stay out of this type of question.

I have no desire to offend anyone.

I have decided for my own definition, that if it makes me think, feel something or inspires me, it is art. It can be a piece of old machinery with flowing lines or photograph or a piece of steel that has seen the hands of someone with a vision.

If I look at something and it makes no impression on me, good or bad, then I really don't consider it art in my opinion. But then again we have to remember that art is in eyes of the beholder and the creator.

Rick Sidebottom
Aspiring Metal Artist


Nic East's picture

Great definition

Hi Rick, thanks for dropping by:
Yes, I agree that art must touch you in sensitive places such as values and aesthetics. It should stimulate you to emulate its energy and strive to better its techniques. Art is a meal for the senses that makes us ever hungrier.
A former teacher once remarked that, to him art was a well functioning machine. I think he was speaking in the broadest strokes, defining "machine as an arrangement of somatic content that serves a higher purpose".

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA
Creativity begins with a novel thought.


PeterG's picture

Art is an extra "0" on the

Art is an extra "0" on the end of the price tag.


QuiQue's picture

Great topic of discussion.

Great topic of discussion. One that has been discussed and continues to be discussed due to the wide gamut of definitions which cover "ART." It's the same with the word "LOVE." Too many things fall into the realm of these words. Therefore, it makes it very hard to define. I've included one of the many definitions for art at the bottom of my comment to give you an idea of what we are up against when attempting to define "Art vs Craft."

I have struggled for years attempting to define art, craft, and even love. My resolve has been to think of art as not only an object, but also an act of doing. For me, art is accomplished by allowing the Creator to express itself through me. The act of creating a "work of art" is in and of itself, the essence of Art. When I am able to let go of the ego and allow the deeper self to express itself through me, I get blown away by that which I have created. The "I" in this case is the Creator expressing itself through my physical body.

I know this may sound strange to some of you. Thing is, we all experience this when we are in the deepest throws of our creations. It doesn't really matter if we are making a tool, railing, or reproduction. There is a place that many of us go into where we loose ourselves (egos). Where time is irrelevant. A place where we become the observer of what our physical self is producing based on the Creators input.

I find I go into this "art" space many times throughout the day. It can last a few seconds, or a few minutes. I can't seem to hold onto the moment because my ego gets in the way. It says, "wow, look at what your doing!", and POOF, the moment is lost! So it goes, and I continue to focus and create until the "object of art" is completed.

The "act of creation" is Art! Now comes the fun part. If the act of creation is pure enough, it will show itself through the object which has been created. The physical object can be, and usually is, called "a work of art." But there is a third component to defining art objects which adds to the debate of what art is. The third component is the viewer.

Each and every one of us has our very own perception of what reality is. Within our perception, we define everything we experience. So it may be that the art which I have created is not seen by anyone else. Does this mean it is not art? No, it simply means that my art creation is not communicating to others. If on the other hand, my art is recognized by many people, and it communicates my intentions, then it is accepted by the majority as "Art."

So what about Craft? Well, craft deals with the physical manipulation of materials. It is easier to identify due to standards which have been established by history and knowledgeable people working in the discipline. Can craft be considered art? Absolutely! Remember, it's in the "process of creation" which art is created. The craftsman which is very knowledgeable of his/her craft, demonstrates their knowledge during the creation process. Can a great craftsman create poor art? Sure!

I hope that I have brought a small minuscule amount of understanding to what Art is. Heck, mankind has been discussing this topic for thousands of years, so if I haven't made myself clear, then what the heck. The idea is to attempt to communicate and hope I have allowed the Creator a moment to express itself.

One of the many definitions from Dictionary.com:

  1. Human effort to imitate, supplement, alter, or counteract the work of nature.
    1. The conscious production or arrangement of sounds, colors, forms, movements, or other elements in a manner that affects the sense of beauty, specifically the production of the beautiful in a graphic or plastic medium.
    2. The study of these activities.
    3. The product of these activities; human works of beauty considered as a group.
    4. A system of principles and methods employed in the performance of a set of activities: the art of building.
    5. A trade or craft that applies such a system of principles and methods: the art of the lexicographer.
    6. Skill that is attained by study, practice, or observation: the art of the baker; the blacksmith's art.
    7. Skill arising from the exercise of intuitive faculties: "Self-criticism is an art not many are qualified to practice" (Joyce Carol Oates).
    8. arts Artful devices, stratagems, and tricks.
    9. Artful contrivance; cunning.
  2. High quality of conception or execution, as found in works of beauty; aesthetic value.
  3. A field or category of art, such as music, ballet, or literature.
  4. A nonscientific branch of learning; one of the liberal arts.
    1. A system of principles and methods employed in the performance of a set of activities: the art of building.
    2. A trade or craft that applies such a system of principles and methods: the art of the lexicographer.
    3. Skill that is attained by study, practice, or observation: the art of the baker; the blacksmith's art.
    4. Skill arising from the exercise of intuitive faculties: "Self-criticism is an art not many are qualified to practice" (Joyce Carol Oates).
    5. arts Artful devices, stratagems, and tricks.
    6. Artful contrivance; cunning.
    1. Skill that is attained by study, practice, or observation: the art of the baker; the blacksmith's art.
    2. Skill arising from the exercise of intuitive faculties: "Self-criticism is an art not many are qualified to practice" (Joyce Carol Oates).
    3. arts Artful devices, stratagems, and tricks.
    4. Artful contrivance; cunning.
    1. arts Artful devices, stratagems, and tricks.
    2. Artful contrivance; cunning.

 


warren's picture

A name

Well there is one thing that I really like about this site.........the name of it ARTMETAL.

 For years I have tried to fit into the different types of what people call art. Most give you a definition that it needs to be a sculpture to be a piece of art. Well I do not just make sculptures.

So when people ask if I am an Sculptor I can say yes. If they ask me if I am a Craftsman, I can say yes. If they ask me if I am a Artist, I can yes, If they ask me if I am a Metal-smith, I can say yes. So I end up being a SCAM. (Just a little joke) Laughing

See it really does not matter what I make or what I am I just have fun making what I make and try to make money off of what I make. They can call what I make what ever they want and when I die it does not matter what I died as.

 warren

http://www.metalrecipes.com


R L Sidebottom's picture

Awesome

I have never enjoyed being part of a SCAM until now.

Rick Sidebottom
Aspiring Metal Artist


Eric Schmidt's picture

Art Vrs Craft

Warren;

You forgot one - teacher. Can you work that in there somewhere.

Now for the real reason for this post and it is a quibble from QQ's last post. I have to take exception to:

#5 A nonscientific branch of learning; one of the liberal arts.

I believe this is a misconception and a false and artificial structuring. People see art as the opposite of science and it is not.

Good science is good art. It meets all the criteria.

You are pushing boundaries.
You are using you own resources - both inside and outside yourself to put together something (rather real, a theory, a math concept, or an experiment to shed light on something).
It is for others to access and "judge" on its merits, results, and fitness.
Art is about discovery and so is science.
There is beauty and elegance in science and scientific experimentation.

I can give an example.
There was a study on night-flying birds that had to do with navigation. Many of our smaller birds migrate at night - lessens the chance of being spotted by a predator and also gives them more time to feed and rest.

This test was designed to test if the birds can navigate by stars. How to do its was the problem.

They were wild birds so you could not let them go and follow hundreds of them around. So they had to be captive, but how could you tell if they would fly around randomly or have a direction to their flight.

They have to be captive, have room to fly, be able to see the stars, minimize or eliminate other variables in the experiment, and also have a means of recording the direction they try to fly to. It also has to have the ability to be replicated so others can also conduct the experiment.

Someone came up with a simple, elegant, and rather inexpensive experiment to test navigation by stars. They built a flight cage with a steeply sloped floor. The top of the cage was covered with screen to keep the birds contained while letting them see the stars. The sloped part is covered with paper and in the middle of the cage is a flat spot that is an ink pad. The birds are fed well before being placed in this cage for the night.

The birds have ink on their feet and when thy fly they will land on the white paper and the ink will leave a record of the direction they flew. It will then be easy to see which way the birds tried to fly all night. If they did not navigate by stars the foot impressions would be equal and random on the paper in the cage.

If, on the other hand, they can navigate by the stars, a favored direction should show up from the prints left when they landed. Statistical analysis could be done comparing the data.

Almost all the prints were headed toward one direction proving that night flying birds can navigate by the stars among other ways.

To me, this elegant in its simplicity experiment was art.

The same can be said, I think, about concepts that are new and spring completely from someones mind. String theory, chaos theory, quantum theory all come to mind. They are breaking with traditional modes of thinking and viewing our universe and, although experiments are hard to set-up, the ones that have been done are proving that there is some merit to these alternate (and sometimes bizarre) ways of viewing our universe.

It is also an open ended art form in that the art is never complete. Others use it as a basis for their own experiments or thoughts and take it further creating another piece.

Thanks.

Eric

Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
Sir Arthur Eddington (1882 - 1944)


Nic East's picture

WOW! What an answer!

QuiQue: You obviously have thought long and hard about this important subject. I love your definition of creativity as God's Work. If we are indeed little bits of God-stuff co-creating the shared cultural universe, then that certainly is the work of the Creator through us. I also think, by extension, that the energy that drives us to create is very akin to Love. It attracts, energises, satisfies and horrifies like nothing else I can name. The act of being in the Flow of the creative process is one of the highest of highs and far better than booze or drugs. It is better for all concerned, for we artists and craftsmen are the tastemakers and lifestyle designers for all others. I try to do my creative play as a kind of meditation and do not let myself become distracted. Of course the telephone sometimes can stimulate resentment as it breaks my flow of work. Yes, Art can always exist independent of peer approval. Constantin Brancusi worked alone in his studio for 30 years without exhibiting anything. Then BANG, he exploded upon the art scene with a number of "masterpieces". It has often been said that Art is about process rather than outcomes for the artist, but the finished artifact or performance or whatever must stand by itself when it is complete. Let me inject another element into our mix: how does Design fit in? Here, I'll give you a start. Design is a deliberate planning process aimed toward specific or generalized results. Since Art is based upon our imaginative, fantastic or creative drives, it is a discovery process, fraught with adventures for the Artist’s mind. One solves problems with a product in mind, while the other has the encouragement of novelty as its goal.

Nic East, Jim Thorpe, PA USA Creativity begins with a novel thought.