ArtMetalsocial networking for the metal arts |
|
Time Varying Magnetic Fields
Frank Castiglione -
Saturday, February 20, 2010 - 11:47am
I was dreaming about a new welder and looked at the new pulsed MIG and Pulsed TIG units.Then I did a bit of research with the magnetic fields that are produced with these new processes.In short I know that I must avoid these kinds of power sources. ![]() Thank You
Frank Castiglione -
Monday, February 22, 2010 - 2:42pm
Hi Ries, ![]() I dont currently own any
Ries -
Monday, February 22, 2010 - 7:14pm
I dont currently own any pulsed power supplies, but I have used a small pulsed tig unit from time to time, a Miller maxstar 150. It was a very good machine, and gives great welds. I borrowed one from an ex employee, and have rented one occasionally. But overall, my hours on a pulsed machine are probably less than 20, lifetime. So I dont really have a horse in this race. I am interested, however, in where you are finding information as to the health hazards of these machines. Generally speaking, I have yet to see any proof that electrical fields are causing deaths on any measurable scale due to consumer appliances worldwide. Certainly, there are claims, but I havent seen any real scientific studies to that affect. There are so many manmade environmental factors that could be causing up ticks in cancer, or other diseases, from hormones in foods to plasticizers in the waste stream, to air pollution, that it is hard for me to believe that high frequencies are responsible for any significant, traceable damage. I am not against health, by any means- I just like to see repeatable, scientific evidence before I jump to conclusions. ![]() Info
Frank Castiglione -
Monday, February 22, 2010 - 9:38pm
Below is a link(copy/paste) to a well written study concerning magnetic fields associated with welding: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr338.pdf Here's another: http://www.fronius.com/cps/rde/xbcr/SID-49B56592-C8A63910/fronius_usa/FA_0205_Assessment_of_EMF_IIW_DOC-XII-1848-05_en.pdf Frank ![]() Well, this one caught me
Rich Waugh -
Monday, February 22, 2010 - 10:44pm
Well, this one caught me completely unawares. I rather vaguely knew there was some talk of EMF from cell phones maybe scrambling someone's synapses, but I had no idea that there were moves afoot to take this whole thing to another level. I read both of the studies you provided links to, Frank. I'm neither a physicist nor an MD so I'm not at all sure I am capable of really grasping the full measure of the studies, but I did note one glaring absence. Nowhere in either of the studies, even by indirect reference, do they mention just exactly what the adverse effects of all this EMF are. Are we having two headed babies, are our livers falling out, are our hearts stopping, are we developing rampant toenail fungus? Just what is the real world effect of all this? Near as I can determine, the primary effect is one of "concern", but no etiological relationships between EMF and sickness have been determined at anything lower than truly astronomical values for the dosage of EMF. Yes, if we stick you in a microwave, you'll get cooked. But if we just let you weld for twenty years we're categorically unable to say what the effects will be, other than radiation burns, thermal burns and flat feet from standing on concrete floors ten hours at a stretch. Okay, I oversimplify here, but I think you get my drift. No one is telling me what the adverse effects really are. In the second of the studies you cite, they do say, "Even under worst case conditions the levels of static fields generated in arc welding applications are far below the established permissible levels." (emphasis mine) For me, the bottom line is that the real dangers lie in the radiation burns from high UV levels in the arc, thermal burns from weld spatter and foolishly touching hot parts, and tripping over the damn cables strung around the shop, but not from some undetermined and largely abstract danger from EMF. Besides, the tin foil hat I wear to keep my thoughts shielded from the alien thought police should also protect my "brain" from EMF. (grin) Rich ![]() Tin Hat
Frank Castiglione -
Monday, February 22, 2010 - 11:46pm
I actually read more studies than that but remembered to bookmark three. The other study examines static magnetic fields. I didn't mean to infer that these studies had definitive evidence of ultimate doom. I wouldn't consider them worth reading.Some studies that are sponsored by power companies take the opposite tact. The fruit that can be easily shaken from the tree of knowledge is the caution they suggest when welding. Proximity to the torch, wires and power source is where the highest risk is as the magnetic field has the highest strength there. Get away a bit and the field is exponentially weaker.Pulsed processes can increase the risk. Bind the ground wire and the torch wire together and the EMF is reduced. Don't drapes the wires on your self. Don't get in between the ground wire and the torch wire.Connect the ground as close to the weld as possible. I think a shielded power cord would make a safer machine and provide a cleaner input. I want to be around a long time and want all my art metal friends to be there with me. ![]() Been welding for better than 25 years
visitor -
Tuesday, February 23, 2010 - 7:55pm
I`ve worked in factories and shipyards and done carbon arc gouging for 2-3 days at a shot and can say that the 2 main problems for welders are eye problems and lung problems.The rest are just the things that go along with working heavy industry and wearing out your body. When arc gouging(at 300+ amps) you can see the hanging leads jump from the EMF.We just never stood in them.It IS common practice to drape the lead over your shoulders and let it run down your working arm though.That way your whole arm supports the lead rather than just your wrist.I`ve welded with a suitcase feeder directly overhead so the lead was as straight as possible when welding aluminum and sit next to the power source so I can dial the amps or wire speed up as I weld. Believe me,if EMF was a real world problem then the unions I`ve been in wouldn`t let their members be exposed to it every day. ![]() hazards of welding...
Stephen Fitz-Gerald -
Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 1:35pm
Stephen Fitz-Gerald ![]() Days gone by
Frank Castiglione -
Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 2:08pm
Stephen, My father delivered Wonder Bread downtown Detroit. He occasionally took me to work with him on a Saturday. I remember the smells from the bakery. Every store owner would offer me a candy bar or other treat as my father was a brother to each one no matter what their color or religion . I miss that Detroit. Peace,eh ![]() EMF's
Stephen Fitz-Gerald -
Wednesday, March 3, 2010 - 11:53am
Stephen Fitz-Gerald ![]() Sound Waves
Frank Castiglione -
Wednesday, March 3, 2010 - 7:07pm
Stephen, Generally speaking fields, whether magnetic or electric,loose their strength inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source eg. double the distance from the source and the field is one fourth the strength. Getting a little farther away from a magnetic field source is worth the effort (respect is not fear). I fail to see the logic that, if there are worse risks,I can safely ignore unknown or lesser risks.Bad synergy is greater than the sum of the individual risks even if you could somehow accurately quantify each. Just close one eye when you weld with the faulty hood.(Sorry, I couldn't help myself) Throw that piece of shit away and get a functional mask! ![]() waves...
Stephen Fitz-Gerald -
Thursday, March 4, 2010 - 1:34am
Stephen Fitz-Gerald ![]() electromagnetic fields
ivan bailey -
Saturday, March 6, 2010 - 9:50am
Ivan Bailey Frank, Thanks for the heads up regarding electromagnetic fields in mig and plasma work. I've been welding for 37 years and nobody ever stressed that before. I have , however instinctively kept from contact with cords and usually work a fair distance from the machines themselves. Since one needs to see where the arc will strike there is probably no way to make a small deflector to fit the torch tip.Will leather gloves help? Does a face shield with a gold lens help? Does a full face green plastic face shield offer any protection for plasma cutting. I have just a small plasma cutter and since I had cataract operations in both eyes ten years ago, Isometimes cut 14 g. steel without any shield, guess I won't be doing that any more! Thank you. ![]() Eyes
Frank Castiglione -
Saturday, March 6, 2010 - 1:57pm
Hi Ivan, Electromagnetic fields can be shielded, magnetic fields basically cannot be shielded, so the distance factor is the best prevention card. My cataracts aren't ripe yet, but the day is coming, my peripheral vision is less cloudy than straight on. Dry eyes force me to wear occlusive eye wear (safety glasses) all day. I think that this practice has bought me some time. ![]() Plasma arc
Daedalus -
Saturday, March 6, 2010 - 6:23pm
It`s just good practice to wear as dark a lens as you can stand(and still see the line) when plasma cutting to avoid any flashing either when the cup is not in contact with the work(like a plunge cut)or when cutting near an edge and the arc is partially visible from the side. In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. |
|
I think you are getting a
I think you are getting a bit paranoid.
A cell phone will put a lot more electromagnetic energy into your body than welding will.
And hundreds of millions of people use them everyday.
Welding is certainly potentially hazardous- but most old welders die of lung problems, caused from breathing fumes.
And pulsed mig machines are much BETTER for you, from a fume standpoint, than stick, flux core, or many standard mig machines.
Particularly when welding stainless steel, or copper alloys containing lead or zinc, a pulsed mig is going to be a much safer and healthier way to go.
And tig is usually the safest of all welding techniques, and that would include pulsed tig.
But hey- you are welcome to buy, or not buy, any machine you want. Just remember that your chances of dying in a car crash out weigh your risk from ANY kind of electromagnetic field by a factor of about 50,000 to one.